al-yeti
-
Posts
9,332 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
124
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by al-yeti
-
Only cos customer won't upgrade yeah?
-
Then swap the panel out completely if your competent, I assume you do upgrade stuff in the IT world
-
Diodes are good man You didn't test them come on , diodes are good lol
-
Makes no sense More like at some point there was a price war , so then the £199 brigade thought about making a fiver on each one or something Removing them permanently is best thing Although bulkier the texe all in one is a far better panel imo
-
Your joking of course.... Lol
-
You know it's going to fail again don't you?
-
I remember that topic somewhere .....
-
https://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/intruder-alarm-c-36/movement-detectors-c-36_116/all-c-36_116_37/texecom-premier-compact-qd-p-3766.html
-
You ever done gates?
-
Your panel uses the resistors it has on it , PIR either have them fitted or there built in Like I said you said budget is good so wouldn't see why you would go for the is312
-
Lol , any but if you going to spend £20/30 on a new PIR then forget these ones Is312 is a replacement for what you have But for your budget a quad PIR texecom or optex are better
-
So swap the board with another PIR dude , fault should follow if it's the put, meaning from another room
-
So your saying the fault now is permanent? If you put it back altogether alarm won't set ? Due to permanent fault on that circuit ? Or you tested incorrectly? Not that our can't be at fault , I would have just swapped the boards over with another circuit by now , or compared it to another circuit the same way depending on lengths
-
2.2 what? Did you change the range when you read that or left it on the 200ohm range If you get good reading on the cable , and not correct reading from panel and fault is intermittent? Maybe you didn't put cables back properly , I doubt the resistors can go faulty
-
Excellent news .......
-
need a good (reliable) wireless panic alarm keyfob
al-yeti replied to James R's topic in Members Lounge (Public)
For what -
Are there resistors in the PIR? Or wires just striaght into the tamper and alarm terminals?
-
Come on , it worked better than the sterling
-
Risco 2 button panic alarm wireless fob issue
al-yeti replied to James R's topic in Control Panels (Public)
Depends on what your trying to achieve I know some who work on masts , they have stand alone thing but it only notifies an arc that they haven't checked in or they have an emergency You search trade yet https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/40634-lone-worker-device-and-apps/?tab=comments#comment-453408 -
need a good (reliable) wireless panic alarm keyfob
al-yeti replied to James R's topic in Members Lounge (Public)
So standalone units do comply with some kind of standards or it's just a case of it seems James wants standalone for some kind of response , I assume the installer himself needs to make sure he's covered on that , imagine it fails pa with response it's there for a reason Seems better way is some basic controls experts have stated -
Dude as Norman But non spec means you still spec it and tell me how it is , designed because of aesthetics more likely , you need to go look how to put contacts on either visible and hidden if possible and spec it
-
need a good (reliable) wireless panic alarm keyfob
al-yeti replied to James R's topic in Members Lounge (Public)
No alarm installed already there to add onto, or you want stand alone which I dont think jw's example do, they are all intruder alarms, JW? Why don't you post in trade? And search trade sure this topic been done though -
Bit weird that , architect design , so they don't want to see contacts Installer should put into frames then some how
-
What comms?
-
Well off from eBay , just hit not as described, or PayPal upto 6months to open case
