Jump to content
Security Installer Community

al-yeti

Trade Full Member
  • Posts

    9,332
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    124

Everything posted by al-yeti

  1. al-yeti

    g mansell

    Only cos customer won't upgrade yeah?
  2. Then swap the panel out completely if your competent, I assume you do upgrade stuff in the IT world
  3. Diodes are good man You didn't test them come on , diodes are good lol
  4. Makes no sense More like at some point there was a price war , so then the £199 brigade thought about making a fiver on each one or something Removing them permanently is best thing Although bulkier the texe all in one is a far better panel imo
  5. Your joking of course.... Lol
  6. You know it's going to fail again don't you?
  7. I remember that topic somewhere .....
  8. https://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/intruder-alarm-c-36/movement-detectors-c-36_116/all-c-36_116_37/texecom-premier-compact-qd-p-3766.html
  9. You ever done gates?
  10. Your panel uses the resistors it has on it , PIR either have them fitted or there built in Like I said you said budget is good so wouldn't see why you would go for the is312
  11. Lol , any but if you going to spend £20/30 on a new PIR then forget these ones Is312 is a replacement for what you have But for your budget a quad PIR texecom or optex are better
  12. So swap the board with another PIR dude , fault should follow if it's the put, meaning from another room
  13. So your saying the fault now is permanent? If you put it back altogether alarm won't set ? Due to permanent fault on that circuit ? Or you tested incorrectly? Not that our can't be at fault , I would have just swapped the boards over with another circuit by now , or compared it to another circuit the same way depending on lengths
  14. 2.2 what? Did you change the range when you read that or left it on the 200ohm range If you get good reading on the cable , and not correct reading from panel and fault is intermittent? Maybe you didn't put cables back properly , I doubt the resistors can go faulty
  15. Excellent news .......
  16. Are there resistors in the PIR? Or wires just striaght into the tamper and alarm terminals?
  17. Come on , it worked better than the sterling
  18. Depends on what your trying to achieve I know some who work on masts , they have stand alone thing but it only notifies an arc that they haven't checked in or they have an emergency You search trade yet https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/40634-lone-worker-device-and-apps/?tab=comments#comment-453408
  19. So standalone units do comply with some kind of standards or it's just a case of it seems James wants standalone for some kind of response , I assume the installer himself needs to make sure he's covered on that , imagine it fails pa with response it's there for a reason Seems better way is some basic controls experts have stated
  20. Dude as Norman But non spec means you still spec it and tell me how it is , designed because of aesthetics more likely , you need to go look how to put contacts on either visible and hidden if possible and spec it
  21. No alarm installed already there to add onto, or you want stand alone which I dont think jw's example do, they are all intruder alarms, JW? Why don't you post in trade? And search trade sure this topic been done though
  22. Bit weird that , architect design , so they don't want to see contacts Installer should put into frames then some how
  23. Well off from eBay , just hit not as described, or PayPal upto 6months to open case
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.