sixwheeledbeast

Merged this thread with your first post as questions where asked with no response. It's likely it just needs someone who knows what they are doing to look at it.

Could have lost it's programming, blown a fuse or just needs a service. Either way time to call an engineer and get it looked at.

Insist? They come to you asking for security advice, they insist something else and you agree? It's never happened, but I ain't got time for messers

Airing cupboards and lofts!? These are some of the worse places for kit like this. Bedroom sounded sensible to me if the system is quiet.

Texecom normal app works fine if you know what your doing. Connect is a separate thing no "relaunch". Enforcer and Powermaster are similar. If you like PnP, Powermaster is pretty much enter a couple of codes from memory.

You need to show the benefit of having a new laptop to your employer, if you can provide evidence for improvement in productivity the owners maybe more interested. I rarely use a laptop for programming and my 10+ year old laptop still does the business when I need it to. Bare in mind having to put in the donkey work if your current software will not work on the new lapy

UDL Options need to disable the remote UDL it's set to answer after 3 rings.

Honda and Rossi will always have opposite agendas since they parted. 2015 was an interesting season several debatable events right through the season, the back of the grid penalty at the last race didn't help for Rossi. Lorenzo will never change, take "Suggested Mapping 8" as a fine example.

This last season of the GP has been hotter than ever. While not everyone can access BT Sport they do a decent job of the coverage and improving each season so far. Unless you ride you are unlikely have much interest or appreciate the talent and exciting racing on show, that's just the way it goes.

Yes, time for a new panel.

Is there a reason you are looking at Hik? Hik no longer allow equipment to be sold to end-users so you may not find a supplier anyway Yes

Your thinking of someone else again... Yes. It would be sensible to pull separate cables for the whole network back to a cabinet and patch up as required if your starting again. I like my motorsport well sport generally, but I just can't watch a full F1 race just completely uninteresting to watch for a long time now, considering it's suppose to be the pinnacle of 4 wheels.

If your planning a rewire then that's fine, just thought I'd mention you can get HD on Coax if required. Bandwidth of your network not the cable, you need to know a bit about networking to get it right. You don't want the camera system dragging your buildings internet speed to dial up speeds. Don't believe CAT7 is a standard, Cat5e would be fine but CAT6 is better if cabling the whole building for IP. Some NVR's have PoE built in or you may need injectors depending on the draw of the cameras or cable length. Motorbikes here, not F1 that would be sjsturner your thinking of.

Been a while since I have seen your name around, all well in the drilling dept? Would a HD coax or hybrid solution be an option if you want to keep the existing without re-cabling? You will need to think about your infrastructure and bandwidth if using IP, it all depends on the site.

98 tick ... the moment the apprentice thinks he's put it in walk test and you realise your going to be on site longer than you expect.

I feel this is going to be one of those critical issues that a huge amount of hardware will never see the fix. https://www.ptsecurity.com/ww-en/about/news/288260/ For those running Intel hardware make sure you keep an eye out for your motherboard manufacturers BIOS update if they release one. Bear in mind this vulnerability is under OS level. Vulnerable processors 6th, 7th & 8th generation Intel Core processor family Intel Xeon Processor E3-1200 v5 & v6 product family Intel Xeon Processor Scalable family Intel Xeon Processor W family Intel Atom C3000 processor family Apollo Lake Intel Atom Processor E3900 series Apollo Lake Intel Pentium Celeron N and J series processors Detection tool (.zip and tarball) https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/27150

Simple test, go to your consumer and switch it off. If your alarm goes into alarm (inside or outside) or dies completely, there is something wrong with it.

Maybe a picture of inside a PIR would help? I would hope if it was 6 core at the panel end it would be the same piece of 6 core the other.

Pin 1 is red

Flash port is for flashing only it's not a Com Port. The flasher board has a the same molex so you can use the same lead for flashing and programming.

Need to check the logs not much point guessing. They could jam each other but are enrolled to the panel so wouldn't arm each other.

The better quality ones anyway. Wouldn't fit sensors without sealed optics, unless I had no option like wireless for example.

Green and Black wires are wrong way round in the sensor if you look very closely. It will be one beep for zone 1 active.

Some sort of bell delay or maybe it's set to internals only on part set.

Wiring looks fine from what I can tell. How many times is the system beeping? Likely to be a tamper issue I agree. Or maybe a blown fuse would make sense if the PIR is active all the time.