Jump to content
Security Installer Community

james.wilson

Admin
  • Posts

    30,639
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    287

Everything posted by james.wilson

  1. lol just processor names
  2. that's your ideal feel, what u really feeling?
  3. some will get my post, if no-one does I'm atom
  4. I'm sure your genuine but if your post is reworded to say. please help please help me defeat this system I need to know when I break I have some way of defeating it Wont happen here. I'm assuming you care about your security and those that provide it?
  5. sorry I ryzen and missed last months
  6. small question, is it secure? we had a member that took this gear apart
  7. not used no, tested yes
  8. true I get euro mini enforcer no way
  9. as ive said before, can anyone pick a Pyronix product ever that you rate?
  10. agreed I only tested current ones back then
  11. no I'm just generalising
  12. piss take aside its Imo a sterling 10. I'd agree its crap and should be replaced. I'd get an old Scantronic 9xxx which would be better. the sterling 10 like all Pyronix panels are proper bad.
  13. id pull out the Dualcom myself and put something better in. Have you not seen my videos on catastrophic failure?
  14. looks like a sterling 10 es
  15. who is your arc?
  16. we'll at least she can't use my stannah anymore
  17. can you stop reposting my pic
  18. yes bit with an obvious restriction on zones
  19. most good panels can be programmed this way
  20. No I think you misunderstood. If you program the panel as eol then you need to fit the resistors in the devices. You are using it (it appears) in non eol mode which enables the common AT circuit. It is that circuit that has a fault you will have to trace it one by one to find it
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.