james.wilson
-
Posts
30,652 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
287
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by james.wilson
-
as ive said before, can anyone pick a Pyronix product ever that you rate?
-
agreed I only tested current ones back then
-
no I'm just generalising
-
piss take aside its Imo a sterling 10. I'd agree its crap and should be replaced. I'd get an old Scantronic 9xxx which would be better. the sterling 10 like all Pyronix panels are proper bad.
-
id pull out the Dualcom myself and put something better in. Have you not seen my videos on catastrophic failure?
-
looks like a sterling 10 es
-
who is your arc?
-
we'll at least she can't use my stannah anymore
-
can you stop reposting my pic
-
yes bit with an obvious restriction on zones
-
most good panels can be programmed this way
-
No I think you misunderstood. If you program the panel as eol then you need to fit the resistors in the devices. You are using it (it appears) in non eol mode which enables the common AT circuit. It is that circuit that has a fault you will have to trace it one by one to find it
-
a list of the stolen keys?
-
to be fair we get lots of trade requests from people that are not trade or don't read and assume that asking for will do. Pete volunteers to do the vetting.
-
Ah sorry Pete
-
PM the relevant details over mate ill take a look at the vetting
-
id like that please?
-
Galaxy Flex With Activ8 Colour Camera & App
james.wilson replied to Buzzy's topic in !!..DIY Installers..!!
no, galaxyguy be your best bet. -
Galaxy Flex With Activ8 Colour Camera & App
james.wilson replied to Buzzy's topic in !!..DIY Installers..!!
12v and alarm cable for the detector, coax if long for the camera. Its main use is for detector activated cctv or covert use -
Galaxy Flex With Activ8 Colour Camera & App
james.wilson replied to Buzzy's topic in !!..DIY Installers..!!
no its a hard wired camera pir for connecting do a dvr etc Oh and welcome by the way -
most apps require you to enter a valid user code to use. Plus you can use the lock on the phone. Just don't write the code and your address on your phone!
-
no I disagree. More complicated to program yes, but use no id say the doc is easier especially if using prox or apps
-
you still get about on a horse?
-
its not the right fob then. You need to enter the fob again using the numbers on them so you will need user entries per fob
-
sounds like you have a duff max reader
