I'd say local only stuff will be a future but not yet most people want stuff to work without worrying or thinking about anything else.
Once their systems they don't care about show when they are out, not close to home and giving pattens to their movement that will change.
Agree with 6 above.
Regarding cams use ones that dont have a cloud etc access. It's amazing that all the Internet reviews only use consumer crap not real pro stuff. I need to start selling anything then add a pro to the name.
I'd be cautious of hik and Duhua without limiting it's access tbh.
There is a open source firmware project for cams that you can reflash
Yes i Raised it many years ago but there was no demand. To be fair its a bit like restricted keys etc there are ways to do it but they are costly. To me adding a wiegand interface would be be the best option
I'd go with brum due to the 'bulletproof' glass. Either needed or hoped for. I still say it isn't bulletproof
Don't need glass break detectors for that
I do hope the op and chubb sort it out though hopefully without double knock on any circuit
On the takeover, or bacon sw on the first day
It's proper rare, some sell laminated as it but real bullet proof is huge. I did a gkn contract where they made it for hummer windows must of been 75mm thick a weight was as expected. In a shop window I'd say unlikely.
But I was wrong once etc
But not behind a 'bulletproof" window with risco detectors done as a diy job Sounds like a setup for a film. No one tries diy on high value goods surely?
Remind me risco do the cheapest stuff or the best stuff?
Glass break detectors don't usually work on bulletproof glass is it actually bulletproof?
Grade 4 signalling is available but grade 4 detection isn't.
What are the insurance requirements?
I'd suggest shock detectors would be better and quicker than glass break assuming suitable ie not a main road.
Also if you have installed it check chubb will do the failure to perform cover.