Jump to content
Security Installer Community

james.wilson

Admin
  • Posts

    30,578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    281

Everything posted by james.wilson

  1. Its ok I found the component I needed in my carbon monoxide detector.
  2. No I'm not angry, I'm soldering a new chip into my boiler, its on the safety side of the valve. I'm not replacing the whole board its just the one bit. Sick of people ripping me off saying I need a whole daughterboard when it just needs one component
  3. Security and protecting you, yours ands stuff.... nah I'm gonna buy I new iPhone instead Ps the memory chip on my phone is knackered, what do I need to replace it. My Nokia 3310 has been working fine until this simple chip failure. I'm not gonna replace the phone for this simple failure. I know I can buy a smartphone for 50 quid but seems such a rip off when its just a chip. While I'm on my TV broke yesterday got a great deal on a new Sony one. Just 800 quid. Get in
  4. what sort of money..
  5. then pd6662 and en50131
  6. bs 8243 if on response
  7. Well I don't know if its red gsm then its about tight, if its Dualcom grade 2 then its a little steep.
  8. But its not just monitoring you are paying for. I'm assuming you have a support and maintenance contract as well as your Redcare fees?
  9. it also feels cheap in use. madness imo for the bit the client uses every day to feel cheap as the assuption is all of it. I know it is cheap, but shouldnt feel it imo
  10. Hello
  11. question? Those that do port forward to an insecure device. If that device is used to gain access or rip a client off, who is liable? The client for allowing access to their router, the manufacturer for weak security or the installer for bypassing the security of the so called 'firewall'?
  12. the ********** on the display is showing the keypad has power but cannot communicate with the panel. So its either a cable problem or the panel is dead. Pressing esc on the keypad will stop the beep while the ******** are displayed but only at the keypad. If the system is in alarm it will need a code / prox to silence and the requires the keypad to be communicating with the panel.
  13. I'm sorry I thought you meant new freq for us. Well I believe so but id guess at it being sometime away.
  14. That's a loss of comms. Use your support contract and get someone out tonight.
  15. Al the units tested are gprs pstn. If you think pstn is secure then id suggest you look at the dtmf protocol. Question. Would you fit gear with a security question mark over it?
  16. Where you getting the firmware file from?
  17. Al this is imo far more serious than anyone getting the pins wrong. Anyone has the right to assume what they fit will do the job and won't be compromised. Grade 2 who cares its low risk. G3 and above is different. I'm interested in nova's comment that the loss would be down to the arc, I don't see that as the arc didn't certify compliance the installer does. We assume the chain complies when the cert is issued. I'm seriously concerned about this and like the vw thing doubt its just one.
  18. get of the fence adi, say what you really mean
  19. didnt know it was posted elsewhere http://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/csl-dualcom-cs2300-r-vulnerabilities.447125/
  20. the vpn bit from what i read is very last mile. Its not end to end. Plus i believe alarm delivery and polling are different routes so polling imo does not prove path availability for alarm transmission. ie some use the same path end to end to poll and deliver alarms.
  21. the tests by cg cast doubt on that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.