it also feels cheap in use. madness imo for the bit the client uses every day to feel cheap as the assuption is all of it. I know it is cheap, but shouldnt feel it imo
question?
Those that do port forward to an insecure device.
If that device is used to gain access or rip a client off, who is liable?
The client for allowing access to their router, the manufacturer for weak security or the installer for bypassing the security of the so called 'firewall'?
Yes id expect issues ahead. From discussions (that I understand as some are really technical)868MHz is a sideband of 900MHz. But it was believed the transmitted ie phone etc had to be fairly close to the transceiver etc