james.wilson

It meets EN though for grade 3, but 5 hours for any signal at all is pretty useless.

It seems to meet grade 3 and we must note this is a grade 3 unit. So its meeting the reg, but not the supplied by the manufacturer documentation. Im assuming the redcare secure 3 will be the same on this attack type. Id still be interested on anyone with a G4 unit verifying the 3 minute stat. Ill update you all on the secure and ww1 tests

Just had a call from the ARC Just been passed a Dual Path Failure from this. Just over 5 hours. So the document that talks about priority polling is not 100%. I thought id get a single path failure quicker than this.

maybe but how many will i have and if it isnt polling doesnt it report such. Also i thought they set them to auto logon to the polling server as it was a problem that people didnt. How do you know if it is or isnt polling? I would prefer if someone else can test one of theirs to see if i have the only unit that doesnt work (well it isnt the unit as that is dead) Ill need to test the red secures as i wonder if that is the same.

I checked that, it isnt on log only Plus im checking the log, so if it was on log only it would still be there. Had a recent issue with 3 of our old plus units going into 72 hour polling failure. was told by csl to go to site and restart the units. No help. Turned out to be a fault at dualcoms end. Currently in a state of high confidence in these....

I need to test another, but fortunatly i only have a handful of the non paknet based dualcoms. I would prefer to test a grade 4 one, but im fairly sure we dont have one. We used red gsm when G4 was needed. I'm quite suprised to be fair over 4 hours now and not even a single path fail has been reported. Where is that document that says 3 mins lol Ill do a redcare Secure 3 and a webway next week.

Following on again from the LPS 1277 topic and after the dual path fail test on a redcare GSM this afternoon I did exactly the same on a Grade 3 Dualcom GPRS. Powered down at 15:20 9/3/12 as shown in this video. Last signal currently shown is the tamper from when i put the galaxy into engineers to open the panel. ie no GPRS fail or PSTN single path failures. Much less a confirmed comm fail (ie both paths down). System not put on test (as it wouldnt be in the wild if it was attacked. Exactly the same procedure as the redcare test. Unit is still powered down, im hoping that something will show up at some point....... Last Checked at ARC @ 19:12 9/3/12

it is now

See attached en50131_bs8243_pd6662.pdf

anti Nowt no anti mask is about risk on the site. Most people do G2 afaik so to generalise that its weak imo goes against most opinion. I personally would go for contact and trap protection on the view. There is an en guideline that dictates this but its optional so far

if the shutter is that big then yes 2 contacts either in the same confirm group or in series is a good idea but not a requirement. Also if the door is dodge id also spec an active beam. agree with the trap protection of an overlooking dt

agreed you cant confirm like that

Had another request for LPS 1277 signalling today from the insurer rather than the broker. Anyone else seeing this yet?

http://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/files/file/250-optima-xm-manual/ pretty much the same. If i recall the XL only gave a backit keypad

agreed staples used correctly are fine imo

it can do that now using the basic alarm integration. Just needs an output from the panel to show set status to the controller. If you need this i can look at knocking it up mate

could be done via android but it would need the app on the pc on site running all the time to actually open the door. Plus it needs paxton pro to get the web version which costs. Do you have any other gear on site?

paxton make a caller id module for net2, that way you can control and record access?