james.wilson

re manufacture yes that is why they have defaults. Its the same on intruder and fire, set defaults. If you 6wb program something unfortunately you are liable for it. You may have done it right at the time, maybe 12 years ago, but if anyone inherits your programming thats what they did. Your programming, your issue. Its the way it is today.

Keep a look on what you actually insured for or Do it properly, default the system fully and take it on.

If you did the last programming then the person yes person not co that did that is the one. One would assume no support contract or expired you cant be liable You need to 'prove' it. If you last 'programmed' it your liable. If new co didnt change the 'programming' then whoever last did carries the liability. Bear in mind its not the client you will have an issue with its the insurer. The client wont care because everyone is insured to include this. Unless you reset just the codes and left the old maintainer with all the liability

Its a shame but the original programmer/co keeps the liability. Its something I want to change because it should be the incoming co/person. Unfortunately it isnt. Panels that allow code defaults are a liability. However i know how it looks but check your policy because you arnt fully insured they chase the one that is. If thats you oops

no but it all helps

When doing a take over the panel should always be fully defaulted.

im sorry for your health issues but feel it needs saying that 2009 isnt fairly new, fairly new would be 2018

i thought made in china was an issue ie hik, dahua huawei etc?

well that a huge plus genuine well done

agreed. Maybe the OP could post a pic of the offending PA?

If the PA isnt pressed (I assume you have checked the window etc) You could consider pressing it and silencing that

Fyi I started writing a huge opinion piece Deleted it

That's definetly a scanny label

Isn't that the ill fated menvier one?

Do orisec know you undo their whole trade and direct only? I don't think they class themselves as amazon.

I try to be

It's about 1200 a year if you want to send it this way out of your profits please do. I asked Elon but he went for the bigger platform

Sorry I was waiting for your subs

Not that I know off, maybe sevweb developer

The wireless airspace is ever changing. Its telling you it has detected something that may jam a detector. Probably some cheap and nasty rf thing nearby unless you have added something yourself. Modern RF gear will channel hop when it detects this, i dont think the honeywell rf can do this.

agreed a wood window is different to a plastic or ali one etc. Location of detector also matters a pro installer is going to do that right and setup accordingly However im with Al that a system would know and detect tamper not a different distance etc Also wonder what the liability insurance wise when allowing a sensor to be refitted without the maintainer checking on a fail to perform?

agree with above. But i also agree its not very good that you cant get service because of holidays. Also note a company should control engineer access for theirs and your protection. I assume it isnt on a service/support contract

Wow I assumed those bells were fake

AG6 proves the point of hugely popular because it was cheap. Low cost stuff always sells better than premium regardless of the quality. I personally wouldnt go for a pyronix bell but again pyronix is popular...

It definetly isnt I find the opposite. Most hits on pro systems are planned.