ICEbear Posted March 30, 2008 Posted March 30, 2008 i can show you a way of achieving 1000 metres without even 1 milivolt in drop im going to up that to 3000 metres without 0.5 milivolt in drop
kensplace Posted March 30, 2008 Posted March 30, 2008 i can show you a way of achieving 1000 metres without even 1 milivolt in drop im going to up that to 3000 metres without 0.5 milivolt in drop Tell us more, I cant think of a way to get 1000 or 3000 meters without any voltage drop, not with normal cables anyway.. Perhaps with 3000ft of superconductor... Or shove more than 24v down the line to compensate for the loss, but then you still do have a voltage drop, even if you get the right volts at the end of it, there is still a drop.. Im curious, whats your method that seems to defy the laws of electricity?
spider Posted March 30, 2008 Posted March 30, 2008 Hi Ice,I'm not picking on you mate, but volt drop in a cable is due to resistance, however inductance and capacitance also play a part depending on the cable CSA, as kensplace has said, unless you use a superconductor, the current flowing in conductor with a resistance will dissapate enery in the form of heat introducing voltage losses, this is why I'm intrigued.The introduction of capacitors, diode pumps, inverters, step up transformers and any other method cannot defy the physical properties of a conductor, that why I made my comment, I can't see how you can justify your claim to be able to supply a load over 100m with less than 1 millivolt voltage losses, the electrical connections alone could cause that if not made off properly. If you can demonstrate what you claim then I will be off the Dragons Den because you have invented a way to save billions, just imagine, no more overhead lines carrying 400kV, the possibility would be a 3 core flex feeding a city!Sorry to come across as flippent, but by anyones reasoning, your claim is quite astonishing, not saying you haven't done it, but their are at least two in here who would like to know how.Correction to text :1000m not 100m
ICEbear Posted March 30, 2008 Posted March 30, 2008 what distances can a 24v supply stretch to without voltage drop?....................not very far if its (DC) but if its (AC) far very far
spider Posted March 30, 2008 Posted March 30, 2008 ICE, Your theory is flawed mate, with the very greatest of respect, I would reseach further on this. http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Book/4.3.11.htm
ICEbear Posted March 30, 2008 Posted March 30, 2008 Hi Ice,I'm not picking on you mate, but volt drop in a cable is due to resistance, however inductance and capacitance also play a part depending on the cable CSA, as kensplace has said, unless you use a superconductor, the current flowing in conductor with a resistance will dissapate enery in the form of heat introducing voltage losses, this is why I'm intrigued.The introduction of capacitors, diode pumps, inverters, step up transformers and any other method cannot defy the physical properties of a conductor, that why I made my comment, I can't see how you can justify your claim to be able to supply a load over 100m with less than 1 millivolt voltage losses, the electrical connections alone could cause that if not made off properly. If you can demonstrate what you claim then I will be off the Dragons Den because you have invented a way to save billions, just imagine, no more overhead lines carrying 400kV, the possibility would be a 3 core flex feeding a city!Sorry to come across as flippent, but by anyones reasoning, your claim is quite astonishing, not saying you haven't done it, but their are at least two in here who would like to know how.Correction to text :1000m not 100m no probs pal my poor attempt at Humour, no no no i didnt meen there wont be volt drop along the way but did meen there wont be any volt drop at the domes if its 24vac step-up<-----------------------------3000m---------------------------->step-down thats why i was trying to find out how many amps at the domes he needed so i could do the Calculations for the 700m
daubs8 Posted March 31, 2008 Author Posted March 31, 2008 Well I need 24v AC at each dome so again, the best way of achieving it please? thanks.
ICEbear Posted March 31, 2008 Posted March 31, 2008 Well I need 24v AC at each dome so again, the best way of achieving it please? thanks. ok lets try again (without everybody) picking on mi 24v you need at each dome. how many amps do these domes need each and how many domes are at the end of the 700 metre run ?
spider Posted March 31, 2008 Posted March 31, 2008 Daubs8, Without going round in cicles, it is recommended that the columns have a 230vAC supply, not only to provide a means to derive 24AC for the dome, but any additional loads that might be required, lighting and detection devices for example, however, to answer your question specifically relating to how far I can run 24vAC, you will have to calculate it as follows: The volt drop = (mV/A/m) x dome current x cable length/1000 The mV/A/m for a particular cable can be found in 'The On-Site Guide' As we have already established, all cables will introduce volt drop, if you require 24v at the camera head, either the cable CSA has to be large, or the input voltage has to be high to compensate for the voltage reduction caused by the cable. Example: Dome current, say 1Amp Dome Voltage 24v Distance 300m 16mm conductor size; 2.8 mV/A/m 2.8 x 1 x 300/1000 = 0.84 v or 23.16 at the head Same example with 230v: 1.5mm with 8.7v drop (9.2 allowed), I would not advocate the use of 1.5, but is given as an example as why not to use 24v 300m of 16mm is not cheap!!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.