hpotter Posted October 11, 2008 Share Posted October 11, 2008 Everything is the same at the customers (50) end apart from the chip. CS may well be different but they must have hundreds of 8440's on their books - bet 99.9% intruder. (so reckon reciever ok). If they dont chip many fire alarms with 8440, it just might be an oversight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireComm Posted November 19, 2008 Author Share Posted November 19, 2008 Everything is the same at the customers (50) end apart from the chip. CS may well be different but they must have hundreds of 8440's on their books - bet 99.9% intruder. (so reckon reciever ok).If they dont chip many fire alarms with 8440, it just might be an oversight. Well finally sorted it out,despite all denial of any responsibility and several chips later, they sent out some new chips today which suspiciously dialled another receiver number,and the chips got a 3 prefix, surprise surprise worked first time,thanks for all your help everyone. johnson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.