goncall Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 i think its good practice to default the engineer code on termination of contract,
james.wilson Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 agreed but if that requires a callout there is usually a fee involved securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.
goncall Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 agreed but if that requires a callout there is usually a fee involved not most of the time,cancelled contracts are mainly signalling systems,and we attend to either remove the stu/dualcom etc or to prog out the digi record if on board digi,prog customer reset and default engineer code,no charge is made to the customer..
james.wilson Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 OK i see your point but from our point of view ie if it were a SIA customer then we would charge to do the above, ie a visit is a visit. Agreed once there then we would do as needed for no additional charge. The only way we wouldnt charge is if it was cancelled before the maintenance ran out, maybe that might be a way around it securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.
A-G Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 not most of the time,cancelled contracts are mainly signalling systems,and we attend to either remove the stu/dualcom etc or to prog out the digi record if on board digi,prog customer reset and default engineer code,no charge is made to the customer.. It's unlikely that a 595 will be a signalling system ... and clearly Abel have been told that their services will not be required in the future so there is nothing in it for them ... therefore they will only attend if there is a good profit. They're quite happy for the client to look elsewhere. What would I do? I wouldn't send an engineer even if the client was prepared to pay . . . PM me for access to the SSAIB members discussion area.
lawandorder Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 OK i see your point but from our point of view ie if it were a SIA customer then we would charge to do the above, ie a visit is a visit. Agreed once there then we would do as needed for no additional charge. The only way we wouldnt charge is if it was cancelled before the maintenance ran out, maybe that might be a way around it Must admit I think
james.wilson Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 lawandorder. I also feel that securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.
alterEGO Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 It's unlikely that a 595 will be a signalling system ... and clearly Abel have been told that their services will not be required in the future so there is nothing in it for them ... therefore they will only attend if there is a good profit. They're quite happy for the client to look elsewhere. What would I do? I wouldn't send an engineer even if the client was prepared to pay
A-G Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 How dare you, prob gardtecs main panel for comms, able used them for a good while, as did Kings. Sorry about that. I thought it was pretty basic ....... but the rest of my post stands. . . . PM me for access to the SSAIB members discussion area.
lawandorder Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 It's unlikely that a 595 will be a signalling system ... and clearly Abel have been told that their services will not be required in the future so there is nothing in it for them ... therefore they will only attend if there is a good profit. They're quite happy for the client to look elsewhere. What would I do? I wouldn't send an engineer even if the client was prepared to pay
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.