Arc Question?

[james.wilson]

i can see your point rog, but this is my issue.

Im not into censorship unless the infomation is highly damaging.

Any system professionally installed should not be vulnerable to the above

in fact no system should be and if it is the system is wrong.

as a rule only low risk stuff is on digi only

we and i assume everyone else always advise a dedicated line, and where the client says no for whatever reason the relevant letter is signed.

as it shouldnt affect a correctly installed and configured system thats why i dont see the issue. if you see my point

[goncall]

.... but surely the info. in this thread is already in the public domain.

depends if your in jail or not,anyone noticed the increase in break ins are using old methods..

[james.wilson]

crime is up,ways of crime are up you make it sound like only james bond break's into houses,tbh its starting to puzzle me the number of newbies on here who claim in thier first post to know nothing,by the 3rd post theve got 20 yrs expierence,i agree with rjb,

this is an internet forum, not a policed and censored user manual. As my previous post where infomation (ie disabling advise on a sab for example) is posted id want that removed. I just dont see anything here that warrants it. Im not saying it dont need removing. It may do. Im just not convinced at the moment it does. I may be wrong (sometims even I am lol) which is why im looking to others on here that do have an issue with it to explain it to me.

James

************************************************************

*

temp locked while we bash out if and why this should be removed.

See trade lounge for topic