MrHappy Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 We have loads of ID, it was the future 15 yrs ago installed properly its no bother at all Mr Veritas God
9651 Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 Indeed, perfect for upgrading older installs that had latching detectors hanging off an 8 core
MrHappy Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 Indeed, perfect for upgrading older installs that had latching detectors hanging off an 8 core once converted a sparks 9800 which went from 8 circuits to 27 biscuits, Mr Veritas God
norman Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 Gus has done the same.... Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
MrHappy Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 Gus has done the same.... Arf was a fan of iD! Mr Veritas God
9651 Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 Just dont fit one in a engineering workshop. We've got a food factory in a huge mill in Manchester. Originally loads of little alarms on site so we fitted a 2500, with mixture of iD and HW nodes. We had a leg that went into the onsite engineers workshop. Wired in screened, all fine and dandy................ until they stuck up the mig welder Lesson learnt with that, swapped out to HW!
MrHappy Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 Just dont fit one in a engineering workshop. had karzima led in unscreened w/o issue in same sort of place. whilst a castle in office on screened with caps midway in devices had hissy hit once a yr, changed to prem devices untouched rock solid Mr Veritas God
robstockley Posted October 2, 2011 Posted October 2, 2011 I have fitted loads of ID panels, never get any trouble and love the way they work. Conventional & EOL give me the hump......... Rob Stockley The Park Security
Cyberprog Posted October 2, 2011 Posted October 2, 2011 Personally I prefer EOL all the way. Given with a galaxy you can wire 2 zones on 3 cores of a cable, it's easy enough to bring 4 zones to a single point with a pair left over for power on an 8-core Cable.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.