MrHappy Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 It's not arrogance, I am correct - just stating facts. & have you currently got a dead squirrel stuffed down your pants ? Mr Veritas God
digitalwitness Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 It's not arrogance, I am correct - just stating facts. That's what makes you arrogant! Because you are not correct, I said capacitance detection, which is a method of detection not the detection of capacitance. Could even be used to detect the squirrel down your pants or your head up your ass! (As if that was really needed).
Ronnie Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 Could even be used to detect the squirrel down your pants or your head up your ass! (As if that was really needed). cracking.. love it
Steve Howard Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 That's what makes you arrogant! Because you are not correct, I said capacitance detection, which is a method of detection not the detection of capacitance. Could even be used to detect the squirrel down your pants or your head up your ass! (As if that was really needed). Wrong again I'm afraid, but since a reasoned debate on the matter seems beyond you I won't waste my time. Last time I checked this was a forum - ie a place for a reasoned, frank and intelligent exhange of ideas - not an ego stroking contest or old boys club. I'll leave you to it on this one!
digitalwitness Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 Quote "rubbish"', quote "I'm correct", quote "wrong again I'm afraid"' - yep, reasoned, frank and intelligent, lol! If you actually know as much as you pretend to, you would be a valuable contributor, your delivery could do with some work though.
MrHappy Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 a company that had to devise an inspection to ensure that batteries were included In the final package, iirc they did this threw some sort of capacitance detection. would it be easier to weigh the box ? Mr Veritas God
Steve Howard Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 Quote "rubbish"', quote "I'm correct", quote "wrong again I'm afraid"' - yep, reasoned, frank and intelligent, lol! If you actually know as much as you pretend to, you would be a valuable contributor, your delivery could do with some work though. I'm not pretending - I'm right, how can I possibly link (for example) to prove myself correct when something is so patently absurdly wrong? If what you are describing is established standard tech, which is applicable and would work in this case, please lets have some links. Enlarge our overall understanding - mine especially!! I have googled and certainly can't find any, which doesn't surprise me.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.