matthew.brough Posted April 2, 2013 Author Posted April 2, 2013 What not to bafe cert? I don't know the details as was chatting with my fire guy over tea. Will post tomorrow all the gory details and pictures. To be fair if and I mean if its listed as a variation then its the clients call not the firm. There is a lot of potential unknowns and 'if' the firm made the client aware it was probably cos it was going to cost the client huge £ and they decided against. I've got stuff that is non compliant on fire, offered the choice of fixing it and they decline and sign the disclaimer. I have no issue with this as its not my look out to do it for free. Tell them correctly and openly and then its down to them. I know the client paid a decent whack to try and get it resolved before we took over. Once I've seen the paperwork ill get a feel which sides to blame although my gut says as they paid fortunes before and are paying a killing for us to be down here makes me think the clients tried their best to get it fixed. Do you know any principal of a college that would want dodgy fire systems on their site? Let you know tomorrow. www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/
sjsturner Posted April 2, 2013 Posted April 2, 2013 I don't know the details as was chatting with my fire guy over tea. Will post tomorrow all the gory details and pictures. It wont be matt, u said its 5 yrs old. And there website says bafe 2010. To be fair if and I mean if its listed as a variation then its the clients call not the firm. There is a lot of potential unknowns and 'if' the firm made the client aware it was probably cos it was going to cost the client huge £ and they decided against. I've got stuff that is non compliant on fire, offered the choice of fixing it and they decline and sign the disclaimer. I have no issue with this as its not my look out to do it for free. Tell them correctly and openly and then its down to them. Nothing wrong with this. You comment on 4 core sndr Were u refering to having 2 sndr ccts in one cable?
goncall Posted April 2, 2013 Posted April 2, 2013 Once I've seen the paperwork ill get a feel which sides to blame you already have
sjsturner Posted April 2, 2013 Posted April 2, 2013 Oddly says on fire page their the only company to have gained sp203 part 3 maintenence. We achieved all modules for bafe 2 years before them!
james.wilson Posted April 3, 2013 Posted April 3, 2013 You comment on 4 core sndr Were u refering to having 2 sndr ccts in one cable? yes that was my thought securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.
matthew.brough Posted April 3, 2013 Author Posted April 3, 2013 Todays investigations haven't helped me sleeping well at night . . . www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/
MrHappy Posted April 3, 2013 Posted April 3, 2013 appears to be a master class in how not to junction FP, Mr Veritas God
Paul. Giles Posted April 3, 2013 Posted April 3, 2013 Now i know why wholesalers look at me blank when i ask for porcelain connectors. Seems no fooker uses them! Dont know how far you go with this especially being fire? Best put lids back on and get the inspectorates in? Although i dont see an issue with no glands fitted to certain entry points? We have done this many times especially when coming out of trunking to the device.
jb-eye Posted April 3, 2013 Posted April 3, 2013 Pic 5,6 &7 are the same pic. Cant see anything wrong with pic 9 & 11. We used to interweave sounders 20 years ago. Its blatently a poor practice, 4 core is pretty much for class change and the likes these days. Customers!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.