alterEGO Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 I can understand that. Any reason why you don't quote a grade and number of paths?We do.Then we are often asked which platform, hence the problem.
matthew.brough Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 We do. Then we are often asked which platform, hence the problem. We refuse to say. For both system and signalling we specify grade and paths. www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/
Cubit Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Last time I went down at least 6 plus development doing hard stuff which is a team of 6/7 Maybe now they have tier 2 as well. Think 2 guys there. I'm suspecting more than 2 for Nationals.
Oxo Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Talking of paths. The Voda SMS server went tits up again Friday. Never going to say " Yes it will text you" again! James when is this eye phone ***** happening?
alterEGO Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 We refuse to say. For both system and signalling we specify grade and paths.Good for you but that does not help with the issue James has raised.
norman Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 You can't educate pork.Do you have any more quotes from your old school reports? Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
ccbrennan Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 All You may not see it, but we are probably working closer with insurers than any other signalling provider. We have also been told for years by insurers that "installers don't ask for your products" - this held us up for a long time until several of you started to ask. If you don't ask you wont get - we will do our side of the bargain which is testing and working with RISCAuthority and talking to the insurers and brokers. You're input is valuable and if James is OK I will be taking some of these comments and providing them in context to the insurers. RISCAuthority are changing and it all takes time.
james.wilson Posted July 1, 2013 Author Posted July 1, 2013 I have no issue with that Chris. RISC has been saying this for years though. securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.
james.wilson Posted July 8, 2013 Author Posted July 8, 2013 All You may not see it, but we are probably working closer with insurers than any other signalling provider. We have also been told for years by insurers that "installers don't ask for your products" - this held us up for a long time until several of you started to ask. If you don't ask you wont get - we will do our side of the bargain which is testing and working with RISCAuthority and talking to the insurers and brokers. You're input is valuable and if James is OK I will be taking some of these comments and providing them in context to the insurers. RISCAuthority are changing and it all takes time. Finally have this resolved. We have moved the single path redcare over onto a new dedicated line as the insurer refused to accept webway in any shape or form and wanted the redcare classic (that's right single path) to stay. We have now confirmed the above to the client. Its not my fight. What an absolute joke this RISC whoever are. I guess another name change will be in order as they were ineffective as IPCRES Still ineffective as RISC. securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.
AdrianMealing Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 Finally have this resolved. We have moved the single path redcare over onto a new dedicated line as the insurer refused to accept webway in any shape or form and wanted the redcare classic (that's right single path) to stay. We have now confirmed the above to the client. Its not my fight. What an absolute joke this RISC whoever are. I guess another name change will be in order as they were ineffective as IPCRES Still ineffective as RISC. James, you want to come to the next RISC meeting? amealing@texe.com Head of Industry Affairs Visit Our Website Texecom
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.