Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Texecom 24 Not Big Enough


jumpdyke

Recommended Posts

Posted

in my van days i had loads of gal 60 chips. i used to use them on 18's as the 18 was a bit **** but the 60 was great.

imo still the classic gal was better assuming 4.06+ sw than an g3 or dimension

I'd agree those g3s seem particularly buggy. Got one I can't clear a fault message on which seems a known issue so a g2 is going in to replace it as it's only small and fe duo if the grief now.

www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/

Posted

They all use the same micro now. They didn't pre-Elite.

Correct, with the exception of the 640, the only other difference is the size of the NVM hence the different memory maps and why you can flash them with the wrong firmware, but also the reason they won't work correctly.

amealing@texe.com

Head of Industry Affairs

Visit Our Website
Texecom

Posted

The Classic and Dimension are not that different except for alerts really?

From a user perspective no, from a hardware design there is a huge difference.

www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/

Posted

Plus the classic was better imho

I agree, very stable compared to it's modern day equivilent. Not sure there will be that many dimensions that stand the test of time as the classic did.

 

Look on the bright side James, if demension PCB's were that good I wouldn't have had to buy 3 replacements from you in recent months :)

www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.