Cubit Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 Went back to site this Am Changed the name from Cctv Dvr to just dvr Changed the port forwarding so rather than one list of 3 ports, it was 3 separate services Avoided using the name Cctv in any of the above No reboot, worked immediately... Ffs bt, what a load of junk. And how much time have you spent trying to sort that?
datadiffusion Posted May 3, 2014 Author Posted May 3, 2014 On site first time, an hour I'd say wasted On here, half an hour moaning I guess! Return to site, just 5 mins thankfully, and its 2 mins from home... for once.... and the tea and cakes made it ok, plus straight onto the m/way for the next job. Would have done it by teamviewer otherwise. At least in future I'll do it that way and that way only, regardless of HH type and if its infinity or not, and it should work... So, I've decided to take my work back underground.... to stop it falling into the wrong hands
Cubit Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 On site first time, an hour I'd say wasted At least in future I'll do it that way and that way only, regardless of HH type and if its infinity or not, and it should work... That's the problem wit BT - should work. They always seem to throw a curve ball in there with constant changes they keep making.
datadiffusion Posted May 3, 2014 Author Posted May 3, 2014 Yet to see a HH5, I did have a free HH4 myself but binned it for a commercial grade double WAN TP-link with rackmount bits... The last thing I ever thought was that I'd need it for 'training'. To show how pi55poor the firmware on the BT is, every time I tried to create the mobile port forwarding on port 18004, it would insist on displaying it as POP3 over on the device page until I deleted it and recreated it exactly the same. Lucky I spotted it and it only took a few seconds to redo. And I don't think any of the clients use that port anyway, even the mobile phones themselves as the app uses 9000. So, I've decided to take my work back underground.... to stop it falling into the wrong hands
21ninja Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 I always create a new service rule for each bank of ports to be opened.
datadiffusion Posted May 3, 2014 Author Posted May 3, 2014 OK, do you mean, you have DVR - 80, 8000. 18000 all in one - which is how I used to have it, or DVR WEB - 80, DVR CLIENT - 8000, DVR MOBILE - 18000 as 3 separate services which is how I have it now? So, I've decided to take my work back underground.... to stop it falling into the wrong hands
james.wilson Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 i create separate rules per port securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.
datadiffusion Posted May 4, 2014 Author Posted May 4, 2014 Thats what seemed to work for me... OK, I know the rules, change one variable at a time, so won't know if it was that or the name change. But it works, and is still working So, I've decided to take my work back underground.... to stop it falling into the wrong hands
21ninja Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 OK, do you mean, you have DVR - 80, 8000. 18000 all in one - which is how I used to have it, or DVR WEB - 80, DVR CLIENT - 8000, DVR MOBILE - 18000 as 3 separate services which is how I have it now? I would do as above in red.
datadiffusion Posted May 4, 2014 Author Posted May 4, 2014 Cool, I also think that was the issue as I had them all in one. So, I've decided to take my work back underground.... to stop it falling into the wrong hands
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.