cybergibbons Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 Just noticed this Internet connected alarm posted over on DIYnot. Looks better than Piper and Canary, but still sorely lacking in serious features. https://www.ismartalarm.com It's got FCC docs online, so I did a quick virtual teardown of it: http://cybergibbons.com/alarms-2/ismartalarm-quick-teardown/ I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:http://cybergibbons.com/
norman Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 This is the way all home security is heading imo. Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
james.wilson Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 Agreed securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.
cybergibbons Posted June 7, 2014 Author Posted June 7, 2014 It seems to meet a need. People want to take paid-for traditional monitoring out of the equation. I don't understand why that has to mean the alarm is missing a load of functionality though. It's no better than a Friedland Response in these terms. I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:http://cybergibbons.com/
Ronnie Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 It's no better than a Friedland Response in these terms. It's a lot about branding, it looks nice, it costs nothing so it's a no brainer for those who can't/won't look to deep.
datadiffusion Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 This is the way all home security is heading imo. Amazed that a lot of these don't yet offer 'a £5 a month Concierge service where we'll respond to your alarm if you don't answer'... Matt?? So, I've decided to take my work back underground.... to stop it falling into the wrong hands
matthew.brough Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 Amazed that a lot of these don't yet offer 'a £5 a month Concierge service where we'll respond to your alarm if you don't answer'... Matt?? We are actively working with a vendor that supports this idea for videofied. Self mon, no answer in 60 seconds comes to us. www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/
AdrianMealing Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 We are actively working with a vendor that supports this idea for videofied. Self mon, no answer in 60 seconds comes to us. And you won't be the only one amealing@texe.com Head of Industry Affairs Visit Our Website Texecom
GalaxyGuy Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 I've toyed with the idea of this as a queue option for my SelfMon service, but not sure customers would pay additional monthly fees for it. If it were an on demand pay X amount per request, then that may work. Something like a web service at the manned arc that accepts a dump of last X events, customer contact list and other info.
matthew.brough Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 And you won't be the only one I'm sure not we are looking at backing it up with a guard response to site as there is little point a human in an arc trying to call the same numbers that the self monitoring failed as its clear the people can't take the call. Like this afternoon I've been to the cinema so robo dial or human, I couldn't deal with an alarm hence the idea of a guard. www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.