Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Wireless Alarms - Why All The Fuss About Cheap 2-Way Wireless....?


AdamAlarm

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have read so many posts saying two way is better than one way wireless. Well, this is true for the middle and upper end systems because they use a combination. Normal PIR's don't need two way wireless, only certain types really like video verification detectors etc need two way and top manufacturers have identified this. Purely 2 way systems are that way because the technology they are using is limited or they are not advanced enough to incorporate the two systems. Hence it  tends to be the bigger companies that do. A good one way system is better than a cheap two way system. If you are only fitting a home installation with standard pir requirements, then a two way has no real-world advantage. As for claims by some companies that they arm quicker, that is just a load of BS. This is true for 1-3 detectors, but any more they take just as long.

 

Its simple, pay peanuts for products, monkeys have made them. I would not want a monkey made system protecting my family. If you want a cheap panel, buy a good cheap panel, not a **** cheap panel disguised by BS specifications. Alarms are the same as any electrical good, buy a Tekinika tv from asda, its specs suggest it is on the same par as a Samsung all singing - all dancing, but we all know it isn't, so buy a cheaper, less specified Samsung instead.

 

Rant over, Peace.....

Posted

I have read so many posts saying two way is better than one way wireless. Well, this is true for the middle and upper end systems because they use a combination. Normal PIR's don't need two way wireless, only certain types really like video verification detectors etc need two way and top manufacturers have identified this. Purely 2 way systems are that way because the technology they are using is limited or they are not advanced enough to incorporate the two systems. Hence it  tends to be the bigger companies that do. A good one way system is better than a cheap two way system. If you are only fitting a home installation with standard pir requirements, then a two way has no real-world advantage. As for claims by some companies that they arm quicker, that is just a load of BS. This is true for 1-3 detectors, but any more they take just as long.

2 way is better than 1 way wireless. It's not a myth it's fact.

While quality is a whole different issue, 2 way wireless have huge advantages.

From a battery life POV many 2 way systems can sleep or switch indicators off to reduce running costs.

From a security POV a 2 way system means that both the panel and detector know if the signal has been received.

At the end of the day if it's a low risk property any alarm is better than no alarm, so I see what you are trying to explain.

However, it is important people understand 1 way wireless is cheaper for a reason and that it's only purpose should be low risk properties.

 

Its simple, pay peanuts for products, monkeys have made them. I would not want a monkey made system protecting my family.

This I agree with.

Posted

Id agree 2 way is far superior. Adam just to confirm 2 way doesn't mean a camera?

I dont think he was saying it was James.

 

Adam wireless is much better than one way, and as far as I can make out all two way wireless systems are made by reputable manufacturers

Posted

I have read so many posts saying two way is better than one way wireless. Well, this is true for the middle and upper end systems because they use a combination. Normal PIR's don't need two way wireless, only certain types really like video verification detectors etc need two way and top manufacturers have identified this. Purely 2 way systems are that way because the technology they are using is limited or they are not advanced enough to incorporate the two systems. Hence it tends to be the bigger companies that do. A good one way system is better than a cheap two way system. If you are only fitting a home installation with standard pir requirements, then a two way has no real-world advantage. As for claims by some companies that they arm quicker, that is just a load of BS. This is true for 1-3 detectors, but any more they take just as long.

Its simple, pay peanuts for products, monkeys have made them. I would not want a monkey made system protecting my family. If you want a cheap panel, buy a good cheap panel, not a **** cheap panel disguised by BS specifications. Alarms are the same as any electrical good, buy a Tekinika tv from asda, its specs suggest it is on the same par as a Samsung all singing - all dancing, but we all know it isn't, so buy a cheaper, less specified Samsung instead.

Rant over, Peace.....

So which panels are you comparing?

Posted

i dont think 'reputable' comes into it. not all 2 way is equal

Different methods of 2 way but I still cant think of a 2 way manufacturer that is not a well known brand which was my point

Posted

One way can sleep just the same as a two way, the only difference is is that the panel wakes it up. A two way detector only knows if it has been activated because it is not fully asleep. So, not sure what that point is about. 

 

In the end it is down to quality and algorithms. The cheap two ways are based on early technology, whilst the newer (Which tend to be more expensive) are based on far more advanced and better thought out algorithms and state of the art electronics.

 

If you want two way, pay a little more. If people don't want to pay it, put a good one way in.

Posted

One way can sleep just the same as a two way, the only difference is is that the panel wakes it up.

 

Still 1 way can't handshake.

It doesn't know it's signal hadn't been blocked/intercepted/jammed

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.