Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Recommended Posts

Posted

",,,,If you were the owner of a national company say and your code was being dished around publicly on a Facebook group, what would your response be??.."

 

What could your response be ?

Posted

I should have been more precise, perhaps I should have said " Would you try to force facebook to take your codes off their site". but on reflection perhaps I was just being fecetious (is that how you spell it) ? 

Posted

Exactly Norman. To me Facebook is more dangerous than standing armies. It tells us when people are going on holidays, picking the kids up from school, are down the pub..the list goes on.

Posted

should be careful giving them out as when employed by a company you sign a contract that would include some form of non disclosure. However any company that no longer maintains a system should be forced to default the engineers code or supply it to the new maintainer in my opinion.

Posted

interesting, I had a new customer a few weeks back that wanted a few things putting right on his Elite 24 after the installer didn't complete some of the programing.

 

That customer got the engineers code off the installer (electrician) who initially refused, so he started going through the process of legal action, the engineer then gave him the engineers code.

 

I explained that the engineers code we have for that system would not be given out but would be defaulted by us remotely upon request for free but we would not be responsible for the system at that point, we will not give the end user the engineers code to maintain the integrity of the system.

 

He then asked if we were no longer trading what would the position be, advised any engineer that knows that system could default the codes if required. Obviously if our code for that system has been removed that system we are no longer responsible.

 

Have to say about 5-10% of the systems I come across tend to be locked.

Posted

should be careful giving them out as when employed by a company you sign a contract that would include some form of non disclosure. However any company that no longer maintains a system should be forced to default the engineers code or supply it to the new maintainer in my opinion.

 

Problem with that is that there is not traceability or accountability on a 4 digit code.

I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:
http://cybergibbons.com/

 

 

 

Posted

"...However any company that no longer maintains a system should be forced to default the engineers code or supply it to the new maintainer in my opinion.."

 

Default it yes, but not supply your own code to the new maintenance company.
 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.