Pyronics/Castle fob on Paxton Net2

[PeterJames]

5 hours ago, Jura said:

 

I only a few, in this instance,  but a regular source would be useful as it's something that other clients would appreciate, and could turn out to be a useful selling point.

Also, it won't be me that buys them, I'll have to pass the details to my firms Procurement Department. 

Ive pm'd you 

[sixwheeledbeast]

5 hours ago, Amps said:

Ok cheers. A little confusing but I guess ignorance is bliss sometimes 

 

I don't agree, aspire to learn more.

What doesn't make sense? You did ask the question after all.

 

[Amps]

I do aspire to learn more. In this industry it seems one is constantly learning. 

 

Your answer was very informative and clear but I still need to get my head around it.

 

By ignorance is bliss I meant sometimes it better just to fit the stuff you know works and don’t bother too much about the technology.

[steve121]

How about using Paxton's alarm integration to set/unset the alarm? one fob problem solved.

https://www.paxton.co.uk/docs/Application notes/AN1035.pdf

 

[sixwheeledbeast]

If I understand the OP correctly it's probably not the best way to tackle the issue.

The customer will already have keypads and will likely wish to use part set or other features.

Also we are talking about a couple of isolated secure rooms potentially nowhere near the alarm controls. integrating that is a lot of work for less potentially less functionality.

I don't know the Castle well but if anything going that route I would expect the other way of having the secure rooms controlled by the intruder would make more sense.

If it where Texecom for example I would consider using door strike but it's depends what the customer needs, reporting logs etc.