Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Recommended Posts

Posted

I agree with PJ but as a subby I would leave a spare pair twisted together in the device if available.

 

Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.


Posted
3 minutes ago, norman said:

I agree with PJ but as a subby I would leave twisted

 
  •  

 

Posted

Testing with a DMM with resistors in place is not going show useful values IMO. Resistors wrong way round you should be finding with normal walk testing as part of the other commissioning procedures.

Likelyhood of this is much lower with built in resistors becoming pretty standard.

Staple through a cable would fault on EOL and if DP the value wouldn't seem correct for the cable length and again you would be closed or tampered so would find that on a walk test.

When everything was DP having the devices contact resistance was useful but with EOL and built in its pointless for reference in the future.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.