Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Recommended Posts

Posted
31 minutes ago, sparks75 said:

Thanks for your replies so far. I thought it was me missing something but looks like it could be a problem. Probably should check before buying! I will ring texecom tomorrow and let you know if there is a solution . FYI @sixwheeledbeastPicture attached of the new impaq terminal layout,.

C0CDC0A8-7F58-4386-A85B-65AF8B9B221D.png

 

one device per zone....

Mr th2.jpg Veritas God

Posted

As above it should be one sensor per input. The old old regs allowed 10 per circuit if latching but that was a hangover from the 70s. I'm a big believer of if you can get a wire to it you should but 10 devices on a wire is worse. If you can't use some form of Id then I'd suggest wireless is better in this case. You could use addressable with hkc and keep the single sensor per point etc

securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse

Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.

Posted
8 hours ago, james.wilson said:

As above it should be one sensor per input. The old old regs allowed 10 per circuit if latching but that was a hangover from the 70s. I'm a big believer of if you can get a wire to it you should but 10 devices on a wire is worse. If you can't use some form of Id then I'd suggest wireless is better in this case. You could use addressable with hkc and keep the single sensor per point etc

Or texe do the mesh? And use wires for something else?

Posted

Thanks for your help everyone. As mentioned above its only one unit per zone and no way around it. Going to buy Impaq E as it’s the simplest solution.

? Cheers 

Posted

I had a reply form another forum which resolved my problem without having to change the sensors. I have attached a picture in the hope it might help someone else out. This configuration will not adhere to a graded alarm

7FCF9C7D-83C9-4B74-88A9-CC500333E60F.jpeg

Posted

Never mind graded, I wouldn't recommend it at all! These thresholds are there to reduce false alarms not to abuse with more devices.

Also if that theory is correct you will have to use strictly 4 devices, as 1 or 2 devices certainly wouldn't go Active when required.

Add to that' no tamper or fault detection on anything beyond the first device and it's not an option that's fit for purpose.

Posted
1 hour ago, sparks75 said:

I had a reply form another forum which resolved my problem without having to change the sensors. I have attached a picture in the hope it might help someone else out. This configuration will not adhere to a graded alarm

7FCF9C7D-83C9-4B74-88A9-CC500333E60F.jpeg

You done it then?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.