Brian c Posted January 24, 2005 Posted January 24, 2005 Glad you asked now?! In Georgy Boy's defence...the wording of my post, clearly misled him! If you don't know......ask.
Guest Posted January 24, 2005 Posted January 24, 2005 Glad you asked now?!In Georgy Boy's defence...the wording of my post, clearly misled him! 38088[/snapback] I think i'll go to see doors in frames to Slough (near London) in March. Gonna spend some days in London too and make some comparison..
Guest Chewie Posted February 9, 2005 Posted February 9, 2005 Flush contact in UPVC door. Inward opening though. http://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/comm...opic=4924&st=60
norman Posted February 9, 2005 Posted February 9, 2005 I'm sure there are door frames in Manchester too 38085[/snapback] Yes but haven't all the doors been kicked in? Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
Guest Posted February 9, 2005 Posted February 9, 2005 Thats a good advert for door contacts and shockies then
norman Posted February 9, 2005 Posted February 9, 2005 You've got an 8 core there, you might as well fit a shockguard as well. Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
jb-eye Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 Well any one nsi gold and going to comment? ref my post 38030[/snapback] Our installation procedures would not allow the use of ANY contact where access to the terminals can be gained by anyone other than our engineer. I trust I am not expected to explain this! It therefore transpires that if we were to use a flush contact the cable would be pulled taught and terminated into a JB thus not allowing removal of the contact without first accessing the JB (the same with shunt locks). It is therefore easier for us to use a surface contact where removal of the top cover would cause a tamper. Now everyone understands the security implications of our decision and this can be related to the same type of common sense that some companies enforce by not allowing staple guns.jef Customers!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.