Guest Umster Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 and we don't fit the 816. Only 595 and 872. 595 is better than the 816. Why do you specifically want the 816? I need up to 30 zone for future requirements, The 816 has upto 32, How many does the 595 or 872 Have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zak Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 I need up to 30 zone for future requirements, The 816 has upto 32, How many does the 595 or 872 Have? As per my recent PM - 595 up to 40 zones - 872 up to 144 (or something similar). I have explained more in the PM I need up to 30 zone for future requirements Are you going to put a shockguard on every step of your staircase? Zak Tankel - Managing Director - Security First (UK) - www.securityfirst.uk.com Disclaimer: Any comments or opinions expressed by me are my own as a member of the public and not of my employer or Company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Umster Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 As per my recent PM - 595 up to 40 zones - 872 up to 144 (or something similar). I have explained more in the PMAre you going to put a shockguard on every step of your staircase? I would like each device seperate on each zone. hense the number of zones. So in furture if I add Smoke detectors, Vipers on each window, further door contacts etc... I won't have a problem. + I've just received planning permission for my side and rear extention, which will have a further 7 rooms. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alarm Protection Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Is it a hotel you are building ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Umster Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Is it a hotel you are building I wish , no it's just a standard side and rear extention B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 I would like each device seperate on each zone. hense the number of zones.... that is normal professional practise. one zone (circuit) per detector. no more, no less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norman Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 that is normal professional practise. one zone (circuit) per detector. no more, no less. Yup, no more, however you may have less. Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Umster Posted January 18, 2006 Share Posted January 18, 2006 Some installers I've had in said they would bridge two devices to one zone...I didn't like that!!! Cowboy!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 ...Cowboy!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zak Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Some installers I've had in said they would bridge two devices to one zone...I didn't like that!!! Cowboy!! That perhaps could be taken out of context. If you had loads of windows it may be that the front room bay for example, if it had 5 openings, could be put on the same zone, otherwise you could end up with 2-3 dozen zones just of contacts. You can have up to 10 contacts per zone. Don't like it myself but it is what it is. Also, if you were putting vibration detectors on windows, if the vibration detectors were in close proximity to each other (say 4 on a bay) then as there is a chance that more than one could be generated by one incident, then they are supposed to be wired to one zone so as not cause a confirmed alarm by say one person wacking on your window to see if you are at home and activating more than one. Thirdly, if you are running out of space on your control panel there is no harm in linking up 2 PA's to the same zone. These things happen. It usually involves cost. Client don't want to spend money. Alarm companies don't want to pay the client for the privilege of fitting the system for them. Zak Tankel - Managing Director - Security First (UK) - www.securityfirst.uk.com Disclaimer: Any comments or opinions expressed by me are my own as a member of the public and not of my employer or Company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.